12.3.15

CFP: Women and Ageing: New Cultural and Critical Perspectives

University of Limerick, Ireland · 20-22 May 2015
Women and Ageing: New Cultural and Critical Perspectives
University of Limerick, Ireland
20-22 May 2014

A conference engaging with the symbolic aspects of women and ageing in culture and society, and the power these constructions exert over old age.

Conveners: Dr Cathy McGlynn, Dr Maggie O’Neill, Dr Michaela Schrage-Früh (University of Limerick)

Plenary Speakers: Prof Germaine Greer; Prof Margaret Harper

Events: Poetry reading by Medbh McGuckian; Roundtable on Women and Ageing

In a time when even Bridget Jones finds herself in her early fifties, it may at first glance seem unwarranted to speak of the invisibility of ageing women in literary and cultural contexts. In fact, in a review of Mad about the Boy in The Times, Sarah Lyall writes that, “Bridget’s amorous adventures … make the prospect of middle age not so bad at all”. Constructions like this open up questions about representations of women and ageing. What types of images of the “ageing woman” are created in cultural texts? Do women in later life, in order to become visible, need to find ways to “pass” as younger so that “age shall not wither them” as Kira Cochraine puts it in an article in The Guardian? Are these legitimate strategies or should women embrace the menopause as a new phase of life and liberation as advised by Germaine Greer? What impact do dominant representations of ageing women have on the sociocultural realities of women in their later years? And in what ways do they compare to earlier representations?

The rise of the new interdisciplinary field of ageing studies / cultural gerontology testifies to the need to reassess cultural representations of ageing and to view ageing not only as part of the life course but as a social and cultural construct. It is all the more surprising that ageing is a topic still marginalised in feminist theory, despite Simone de Beauvoir’s testimony to her dismay at ‘society’s secret shame’ in The Coming of Age in 1970. There are some notable exceptions, such as Germaine Greer’s work on the postmenopausal woman, Susan Bordo’s work on the body, or Lynne Segal’s recent reflection and analysis of the process of growing older. This conference will engage with the symbolic aspects of women and ageing in culture and society, and the power these constructions exert over public and private conceptions of old age.

The aim of this conference is to provide an opportunity to discuss intersections of the cultural, social and medical dimensions of women and ageing. It will engage with discourses on ageing in their various cultural manifestations through the ages but also across different cultures, genres and media. We invite papers from diverse disciplines such as literary and cultural studies, film and media studies, philosophy, anthropology, linguistics and the medical humanities.

Possible topics can include but are not limited to:
  • Ageing, autobiography and lived experience
  • Technologies, medicine and ageing
  • Ageing and popular culture
  • Ageing and neoliberalism
  • Visual images of ageing
  • Age and performance
  • The ageing body as text
  • Ageing and memory
  • Stigma
  • Myths about ageing, women in myth
  • Age and creativity
  • Queer ageing
  • Love, loss and mourning
  • Health, menopause, the post-maternal body
  • Male representations of women and ageing
  • Older and younger mothers
  • The ageing spinster
  • The cult of youth and perceptions of beauty
  • Ageing, recession and dependency
  • Ageing and women minorities
  • Age, race, and colour

Queries may be directed to the conference organisers at ageing.women@gmail.com. Please submit proposals for papers or panels by 15 March 2015. Proposals should be 250 words and should include a 50-word biography.

Website: womenandageing.wordpress.com
21.8.13

Djuna Barnes, stunt journalist

A story from NPR
Djuna Barnes
From NPR (thanks to Cathryn Setz for the link):
A writer, illustrator and provocateur in the Roaring '20s, Djuna Barnes stood out.

"She was much more interested in embracing the quirky and embracing that idea that became so famous in feminist circles half a century later," Catherine Morris says, "the idea that the personal is political."

Morris is the curator of a new exhibition of Barnes' writings and illustrations called "Newspaper Fictions" at the Brooklyn Museum's Sackler Center for Feminist Art.

The story goes that Djuna Barnes — who grew up with her mother, grandmother, polygmaist father, his mistress and brothers she'd help support — walked into the office of the Brooklyn Daily Eagle and announced: "I can draw, I can write, you'd be foolish not to hire me." And the paper did.

Barnes' whimsical drawings lent a satirical charm to her reporting. The newsprint and photographs on display are a bit faded, but Barnes' voice is still kicky. You could imagine some of her articles printed today in Vogue or The New Yorker.

"Part of the series that she did was called 'Odd types found in and around Brooklyn,' " Morris tells NPR's Jacki Lyden. "She would find individuals, strange people — across class lines, race lines, across all sorts of social milieus — and kind of draw pictures for her audience. And literally draw pictures." [Read More]

Also at A Piece of Monologue:
30.5.13

In Defence of Judith Butler

Darin Barney comments on recent controversies
Judith Butler
From Darin Barney (The Huffington Post):
On Thursday June 30, 2013, McGill University will confer an honorary doctorate on American philosopher Judith Butler. For many of us who work and study at McGill, and for many others who look to universities such as McGill for moral leadership, this will be a tremendous day, a day when -- even if for only a brief, symbolic moment -- it will seem as if the university is what we imagine it to be in our fondest hopes: a place where thought that is fearless in its devotion to justice is not only tolerated, but honoured.

Judith Butler, Professor in the Departments of Rhetoric and Comparative Literature at the University of California, Berkeley, is a tower of contemporary social and political thought. Her work -- in several books over two decades--on gender, sex, sexuality, queerness, feminism, bodies, political speech and ethics has changed the way scholars all over the world think, talk and write about identity, subjectivity, power and politics. It has also has changed the lives of countless people whose bodies, genders, sexualities and desires have made them subject to violence, exclusion and oppression, by lending recognition, dignity and power to their experience, and by illuminating the contours of an ethics in which we might begin to live well with, and because of, the differences that constitute us. That McGill will recognize her with an honorary degree gives hope to many of us whose faith in the university has been challenged in recent years.

But not everyone feels this way.

Professor Butler, who is Jewish, is an outspoken critic of the state of Israel's treatment of the Palestinian people and its occupation of disputed territories, and a supporter of the international campaign to use Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions as means to pressure the Israeli government to end the occupation and extend equal rights and reparations to unlawfully displaced Palestinian citizens. This has prompted Hillel McGill and McGill Students for Israel to issue a letter of protest calling on the McGill administration to reconsider its decision to honour Professor Butler. Their position has been supported in a recent editorial by Barbara Kay in the National Post and in a post to the Open Zion blog by McGill History Professor Gil Troy. [Read More]

Also at A Piece of Monologue:
29.5.13

Why Sylvia Plath still haunts us

James Parker reflects on our enduring fascination with the poet
Sylvia Plath
From James Parker (The Atlantic):
Her name, at this point, is almost onomatopoeic: the elegantly coiled, haute-American Sylvia, poised and serpentine, and then the Germanic exhalation of Plath, its fatal flatness like some ruptured surface resealing itself. Her whole history is in there somehow: the shining prizewinner with a death obsession, the supercharged, comical/terrible talent whose memory is the lid of a sarcophagus.

“This is the light of the mind, cold and planetary / The trees of the mind are black. The light is blue.” That’s the Plath-world, freakishly bleak, exerting its tractor-beam fascination on American culture. Fifty years after she killed herself, we find her vital, nasty, invincible, red-and-white poetry sitting in a region of cultural near-­exhaustion. Her short life has been trampled and retrampled under the biographer’s hoof, her opus viewed and skewed through every conceivable lens of interpretation. A Massachusetts girlhood; a precocious literary ascent interrupted by an early nervous breakdown; a decampment to England; marriage to—and separation from—the poet Ted Hughes; suicide. In her lifetime, she published just one book of poetry (The Colossus and Other Poems), one novel (The Bell Jar), and a few stories in magazines. Upon her death, the bulk of her work—including the completed manuscript of Ariel—was still unknown to readers.

Out of these elements, endless constructions and conjurations. The ’70s enthroned her as a feminist martyr. She has been posthumously psychoanalyzed, politicized, astrologized. She did, it’s true, pack into her three decades a remarkable number of reboots and re-selvings—transformation, and its lethal opposite, was her theme—but even so … Can’t we leave her alone? [Read More]

Also at A Piece of Monologue:
14.9.12

Samuel Beckett: Form and History Conference

Halifax, Nova Scotia · 28-30 June, 2013
Design: Rhys Tranter
Samuel Beckett: Form and History
Halifax, Nova Scotia
28-30 June, 2013

Saint Mary’s University (Halifax, Nova Scotia)
Saint Francis Xavier University (Antigonish, Nova Scotia)

What forms of historical knowledge might be usefully addressed to Beckett’s works? In what ways might Beckett’s formal explorations, or formal analysis of those explorations, be conceived of as intrinsically historical? While Beckett studies has often been structured by an opposition between formalist and historical approaches, the aim of this conference is to think collectively about how form and history are related in Beckett’s writing and in critical responses to his work. We welcome papers that engage with various historical contexts, and are particularly interested in how historical analysis might address the formal complexities of Beckett’s work. Specific points of engagement might involve the following questions: how might the conditions in post-war France have informed Beckett’s formal experimentation? What is novel, for example, about the post-war Beckettian novel? How is Beckett’s writing involved (or at odds) with the histories of modernist and postmodernist forms, particularly in view of the ongoing re-mapping of these terms of literary periodization and their temporal and spatial parameters? What forms of history (feminist, queer etc) might contribute to a history of Beckettian forms? Our hope is to generate conversation across the boundaries and binaries (archive/text, for example, or history/theory) that have begun to structure Beckett studies in recent years. How might these different emphases be brought together? What form might a collaborative approach to Beckett studies take? There will be no keynote address, but rather a series of workshops addressing how to integrate the differing strands of work that have been done in recent years. These workshops will accompany the more traditional three paper panel format. There will also be no parallel sessions, in order to facilitate depth of engagement, and priority will be given to submissions that address the conference theme.

Submissions

Proposals of no more than 300 words to be sent to Michael D’Arcy and Seán Kennedy (beckettinhalifax@gmail.com) by 30 January 2013.

Registration

Faculty $100
Students/Unwaged Free

Also at A Piece of Monologue:
26.5.12

Alternative Modernisms: An International, Interdisciplinary Conference

Cardiff University, 16-18 May 2013

About the Conference

This international, interdisciplinary conference aims to bring attention to critically neglected modernist texts, movements and forms, as well as considering the extent to which modernisms are themselves (an) alternative – to realism, tradition, mass culture, or even to each other.

The conference will also include the inaugural meeting of the new Welsh Network of Modernist Studies.

Keynote Speakers

Jean-Michel Rabaté is the Vartan Gregorian Professor at the University of Pennsylvania. A prolific literary critic and theorist, he has authored or edited more than thirty books on modernism, psychoanalysis, contemporary art, philosophy, and writers like Beckett, Pound and Joyce. Selected recent works include 1913: The Cradle of Modernism (2007), The Ethic of the Lie (2008), Being Given, 1 Degree Art, 2 Degrees Crime: Modernity, Murder and Mass Culture (2006). The Ghosts of Modernity has been republished in 2010. He is one of the founders and curators of Slought Foundation in Philadelphia (slouhgt.org); a managing editor of the Journal of Modern Literature; a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and president of the American Samuel Beckett Studies association. Currently, he is completing a book on Beckett and editing an anthology on modernism and literary theory, forthcoming in 2013.

Griselda Pollock is the Director of the Centre for Cultural Analysis, Theory & History (CentreCATH) and Professor of Social & Critical Histories of Art in the School of Fine Art, History of Art & Cultural Studies at the University of Leeds. She is also currently the Pilkington Visiting Professor of Art History at the University of Manchester (2011-12) and was previously the Getty Visiting Professor at Jawaharlal Nehru University in New Delhi (2011). Her extensive interests encompass nineteenth to twenty-first century visual arts; feminist, queer and postcolonial cultural theory; cinema; cultural memory; and gender and the museum. Selected recent publications include: Allo-thanatography or Allo-auto-biography: A Few Thoughts on One Painting in Charlotte Salomon's Leben oder Theater? 1941-42 (2011); Encounters in the Visual Feminist Museum: Time, Space and the Archive (2007); Vision and Difference: Feminism, Femininity and the Histories of Art (2003).

Ástráður Eysteinsson is Professor of Comparative Literature and (since 2008) Dean of the School of Humanities, University of Iceland. He has written extensively on theories of modernism and the avant-garde. He has also worked in the areas of translation (both as translator and scholar), cultural studies, island and place studies. Together with Vivian Liska, he edited the monumental two-volume Modernism (2007), for which they were awarded the 2008 MSA Book Prize. Other selected publications include The Concept of Modernism (1990), Umbrot. Bókmenntir og nútími (1999) [on literature and modernity] and, as editor, Translation – Theory and Practice (with Daniel Weissbort, 2006). With Eysteinn Thorvaldsson, he has translated a number of Kafka’s novels, short stories, diaries and letters into Icelandic.

Call for Papers

In recent years an increasing number of attempts have been made to widen the traditional modernist canon beyond Wyndham Lewis's white, Anglo-American, 'Men of 1914'. Work on women, LGBT and black modernists, as well as marketplace, magazine and middlebrow studies, have expanded the canon, and yet such 'alternative' modernisms are often studied and discussed in isolation, leading to a splintering of the field. This fragmented approach to modernist studies is in danger of not reflecting – or taking into account – the wider cultural and public sphere which modernisms existed in and engaged with. Furthermore, many modernisms, in particular national and regional forms and movements in Europe, still remain largely uncharted.

This conference attempts to provide a common forum for the exchange of ideas and examples across fields, disciplines and nationalities. It will give scholars an opportunity to explore both underexplored modern(ist) forms, mediums, texts, writers and artists, and the relationships between them, working towards a more holistic conception of how ‘alternative’ modernisms operated.

Indeed, the conference will consider the extent to which all modernisms can be viewed as part of a network of alternatives – to tradition, realism, representation, mass culture or even to each other. As such, the conference hopes to reassess – and problematize – modernisms’s approaches to the past, to modernity (or ‘modernities’), to other modernisms, and their position within modern culture, exploring new theories and approaches for studying modernisms.

Considering that Welsh modernism in particular still resides on the margins of British modernism – geographically and intellectually – Cardiff is the perfect place for such a reassessment. The conference will also host the inaugural meeting of the Welsh Network of Modernist Studies, a new umbrella organisation which will organise and promote interdisciplinary events that foster links between modernist scholars in Wales.

Submissions are invited that engage with all aspects of the title. Papers might include (but are not limited to):
  • Modernisms as alternatives to realism, representation, religion, tradition, linearity, mass culture, ‘grand narratives’ etc.
  • Modernism/modern(ist) thought as an alternative way of seeing/theorising the world
  • ‘Alternative’ modernisms – modernisms outside the modernist canon or mainstream, whether for reasons of race, ethnicity, nationality, language, gender, sexuality, class, geography, aesthetics, ideology, chronology etc.
  • Middlebrow or popular forms as an alternative to High Modernism
  • Alternative ideologies and aesthetics within the (retrospectively applied) field of modernism and the historical avant-garde – differences and contradictions in beliefs and approaches
  • Alternative ways of living/lifestyles by modernist figures
  • Alternative chronologies, definitions, canons or readings of modernism
  • Movement of modernism from an alternative to its contemporary position in the academic, artistic and literary mainstream canon.
Submissions are encouraged on all modern(ist) forms and disciplines, including art, design, fashion, film, literature, drama, music, performance and architecture, as well as modern theory and philosophy. We especially welcome interdisciplinary approaches, ranging across literary studies, history, cultural history, art history, philosophy and critical theory as well as other disciplines in the humanities.

Proposals for papers (20 minutes) should include the paper title; the delegate’s name, address and email; a summary of the proposed paper (300 words); and a short bio (100 words).

Proposals should be sent to modernisms@cardiff.ac.uk by 31 October 2012.

For the full call for papers, please click:

Call for Papers: Extended

CFP deadline extended until 31 December 2012

An announcement from the organisers: 'The initial call for papers deadline has now closed. Thank you to everyone who has submitted a proposal; we will endeavour to get back to you as soon as possible. We have, however, had many requests for extra time to submit proposals, so we have decided to extend the deadline until the end of the year. The new deadline is now 31 December 2012. The CFP remains the same, but we are particularly looking for proposals on the visual arts, music, material culture and from Eastern Europe to supplement our already excellent submissions. We look forward to receiving your proposals!'

For more information:

Website: www.cf.ac.uk/encap/modernisms/conference.html
Facebook: www.facebook.com/alternativemodernisms
Twitter: www.twitter.com/AltModernisms
29.11.11

Rachel Bowlby, A Child of One's Own: Parental Stories

Assuming Gender Annual Lecture · Cardiff University, 14 December 2011
Design: Rhys Tranter. Click to download poster (PDF)
Some readers of A Piece of Monologue may be aware that I am on the editorial committee of Assuming Gender, an academic project founded and organized by postgraduates. The project is structured around three research-led pursuits: a freely-accessible academic journal, an ongoing seminar series, and an annual lecture presented by a respected scholar.

This year's Assuming Gender annual lecture is just around the corner, and you may be interested to know that attendance is absolutely free. And no prior booking is necessary. I've designed a poster for the event (above) which is downloadable in a PDF format, should you wish to share news of the talk with friends and colleagues. The following text is taken from a press release on the Assuming Gender website:

'A Child of One's Own: Parental Stories'
An Assuming Gender Guest lecture by Professor Rachel Bowlby (University College London)
Wednesday 14 December 2011, 5.15pm
Lecture Theatre 2.01, Humanities Building, Cardiff University, Colum Drive
All welcome
Funded by the University Graduate College and ENCAP

We are delighted to announce that the 2011 Assuming Gender Annual lecture will be given by Professor Rachel Bowlby (University College London), and is entitled 'A Child of One's Own: Parental Stories'.

About the speaker:
Rachel Bowlby is Northcliffe Professor of English at UCL. Her books include Just Looking (1985), Still Crazy After All These Years: Women, Writing and Psychoanalysis (1992), Shopping with Freud (1993), Carried Away: The Invention of Modern Shopping (2000), and, most recently, Freudian Mythologies: Greek Tragedy and Modern Identities (2007). She has edited Virginia Woolf’s Orlando and two volumes of Woolf’s critical writings, and is also the author of Feminist Destinations and Further Essays on Virginia Woolf (1997). She has translated a number of books by contemporary French philosophers, including Derrida’s Of Hospitality (2000) and Paper Machine (2005). She currently holds a two-year Leverhulme Major Research Award.

About the lecture:
Parenthood is a neglected topic in comparison with other elemental attachments (the passions of childhood or erotic love). But recent radical changes in typical family forms and in procreative possibilities (new reproductive technologies) expose the mutability and multiplicity of ‘parentalities’, creating new kinds of parental story and new questions about parenthood. Why do people want (or not want) to be parents? How has the ‘choice’ enabled by contraception changed the meaning of parenthood? Today, the positive choice to seek and have a child as a matter of personal fulfillment is accepted as valid for men as well as women, individuals as well as couples. But there are also antecedents to the contemporary orientation, sometimes in classical texts where the parental story has up till now been sidelined. This lecture will look at one example of this phenomenon, Dickens’s Great Expectations.

Event Website:
assuminggender.com

If you have any questions about attendance, please feel free to add a comment below.

Also at A Piece of Monologue:
28.6.11

Writers on Twitter

A selection of literary figures you might want to follow
Margaret Atwood
The Accredited Online Colleges website has compiled a list of '50 Impressive Literary Figures You Should Follow on Twitter'. While not all of them are strictly 'literary', many of them are interesting, and there may be one or two you are not aware of. Here is a brief selection:
  • William Gibson: Of course one of cyberpunk’s progenitors would make his way to Twitter! William Gibson is generous with retweets and replies, but he does talk about his own work as well as things piquing his interest.
  • Doug Coupland: Most of the Generation X and Hey, Nostradamus! writer’s feed is occupied with brief thoughts and the occasional link.
  • Stephen Fry: Although known mainly as a comedic actor, Stephen Fry also happens to be an acclaimed author and mental health awareness activist — one with a beautifully funny, provocative Twitter.
  • Hugo Schwyzer: The Pasadena City College professor of gender studies and history is a prolific feminist and sociological commentator with an amazing oeuvre. His feed makes articles and insights quickly accessible for changemakers on the go.
  • Mignon Fogarty: Grammar Girl herself keeps a Twitter, carrying over the informative content found on her blog and in her podcast and books.
  • Paulo Coelho: With tweets in both Brazilian Portuguese and English, the celebrated, prolific Paulo Coelho uses his social media skills to touch a broad range of fans.
  • Arianna Huffington: Understandably, most of the publishing and media giantess’ tweets mostly have to do with politics and culture rather than writing and reading.
  • Augusten Burroughs: Twitter allows fans to step into the life of this popular memoirist, learning more about his projects and personal thoughts.
  • Chris Anderson: As the editor-in-chief of Wired, the incredibly popular Chris Anderson stands at the forefront of new media, science and technology journalism — a fact reflected right there in his feed.
  • Margaret Atwood: Critically-lauded, award-winning The Handmaid’s Tale author Margaret Atwood loves herself some retweets, but she also manages to slip talks about her own views, projects and events as well.
  • Tao Lin: Prolific poet, essayist and Vice columnist and cartoonist Tao Lin tweets some interesting observations and links to various works.

[Read the complete list]
9.6.11

Jacques Derrida Today Conference 2011: CFP

11-13 July 2012
Jacques Derrida
Call for Papers: Jacques Derrida Today Conference
11-13 July 2012
University of California, Irvine, USA.

Hosted by Professor Stephen Barker (UCI)

Keynotes

  • David Wills
  • Penelope Deutscher
  • Tom Cohen
  • Élisabeth Roudinesco

Proposal Deadline

Due dates for Abstracts and Panel Proposals: 21 November 2011

Call for Papers

The Derrida Today Conference will focus on the ongoing value of Derrida’s work to the political-ethical, cultural, artistic and public debates and philosophical futures that confront us.

The conference will be broadly interdisciplinary and invites contributions from a range of academic, disciplinary and cultural contexts. We will accept papers and panel proposals on any aspect of Derrida’s work or deconstruction in relation to various topics and contemporary issues, such as: philosophy, phenomenology and other theoretical/philosophical thinkers, literature, psychoanalysis, architecture and design, law, film and visual studies, haptic technologies, photography, art, music, dance, embodiment, feminism, race and whiteness studies, politics, ethics, sociology, cultural studies, queer theory, sexuality, education, science (physics, biology, medicine, chemistry), IT and multimedia, technology, etc.

Individual Participants: submit 300 words abstract for a 20 minute paper. Please include a bio (no more than 100 words), affiliation and contact details.

Panel Proposals: Panels will consist of 3 papers of 20 minutes delivery and 10 minutes discussion time each. Panel organizers should submit an overall panel proposal of 100 -200 words, plus individual abstracts of 300 words for each paper, along with personal bios and contact details (email, address and phone), and their university affiliation, of each member of the panel. The panel organiser should also supply their bio and contact details and affiliation.

Due Date for Abstracts and Panel Proposals: 21 November 2011.

Submissions

Individual Abstracts & Panel Proposals should be sent as an attachment to: derridatodayconference@gmail.com

All enquiries about the conference only, to this email address.

The conference is based on the journal Derrida Today (general editors: Nicole Anderson & Nick Mansfield, reviews editor: Martin McQuillan, Associate Editor: Simon Morgan Wortham). The journal is published by Edinburgh University Press, ISSN: 1754-8500).

Website and Contact

EUP Journal Website: http://www.euppublishing.com/journal/drt
Derrida Today Journal email: dteditors@gmail.com

Enquiries about the journal and submissions should be sent to this address only.

Participants will be invited to submit article length versions of their papers for consideration for publication in the journal.

Executive Conference Organising Committee: Nicole Anderson (Macquarie University), Stephen Barker (University of California, Irvine), Nick Mansfield (Macquarie University), Martin McQuillan (Kingston University), Simon Morgan Wortham (Kingston University).

Also at A Piece of Monologue:
27.1.11

Margaret Atwood: The Robber Bride, The Blind Assassin, Oryx and Crake

A new collection of scholarly articles exploring Atwood's work
J. Brooks Bouson (editor), Margaret Atwood: The Robber Bride, The Blind Assassin, Oryx and Crake
In a bulletin for interesting new books being published this year, Conversational Reading is promoting J. Brooks Brouson's edited collection of essays on the work of Margaret Atwood. Simply entitled Margaret Atwood: The Robber Bride, The Blind Assassin, Oryx and Crake, it includes a critical discussion of some of the major themes in Atwood's work, from trauma, memory and mourning to parody, feminism and environmentalism. In all, a promising collection.

The book was published on 17 January 2011. I've gleaned the following from the Continuum website:

About the Collection

In this critical collection, well-known Atwood scholars offer original readings and critical re-evaluations of three Atwood masterpieces—The Robber Bride, The Blind Assassin, and Oryx and Crake. Providing new critical assessments of Atwood’s novels in language that is both lively and accessible, Margaret Atwood reveals not only Atwood’s ongoing and evolving engagement with the issues that have long preoccupied her—ranging from the power politics of human relationships to a concern with human rights and the global environment—but also her increasing formal complexity as a novelist. If Atwood is a novelist who is part trickster, illusionist and con-artist, as she has often described herself, she is also, as the essays in this critical collection show, an author-ethicist with a finely honed sense of moral responsibility.

Contents

Series Preface \ Acknowledgments \ 1. Introduction: Negotiating with Margaret Atwood J. Brooks Bouson \ Part I: The Robber Bride (1993) 2. Magical Realism in The Robber Bride and Other Texts Sharon R. Wilson \ 3. Parodic Border Crossings in Atwood’s The Robber Bride Hilde Staels \ 4. You’re History: Living with Trauma in The Robber Bride Laurie Vickroy \ Part II: The Blind Assassin (2000) 5. “Was I My Sister’s Keeper?” The Blind Assassin and Problematic Feminisms Fiona Tolan \ 6. Narrative Multiplicity and the Multi-layered Self in Margaret Atwood’s The Blind Assassin Magali Cornier Michael \ 7. “If You Look Long Enough”: Photography, Memory, and Mourning in The Blind Assassin Shuli Barzilai \ Part III: Oryx and Crake (2003) 8. Moral/Environmental Debt in Margaret Atwood’s Payback and Oryx and Crake Shannon Hengen \ 9. Problematic Paradice: Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake Karen Stein \ 10. The Apocalyptic Imagination in Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake Mark Bosco \ Notes on Chapters \ Works Cited \ Further Reading \ Notes on Contributors \ Index

Reviews

We welcome this new collection of essays on Margaret Atwood’s later novels, the first to include a substantial section on Oryx and Crake. J.Brooks Bouson has assembled an international team of major Atwood scholars who show us fascinating new ways of understanding Atwood’s fiction by highlighting features which range from magic realism to environmentalism and debt, trauma narratives, and her apocalyptic imagination. The critical inventiveness of these essays matches Atwood’s own irrepressibly creative storytelling.

Coral Ann Howells, Professor Emerita, University of Reading, Senior Research Fellow at the Institute of English Studies, University of London, UK and co-editor of the Cambridge History of Canadian Literature (CUP, 2009)
Publisher's website: Continuum

Also at A Piece of Monologue
5.1.11

Afromodernisms 2

What’s really new? Blackness and Atlantic Modernism, 1907–61
Afromodernisms 2
What’s really new? Blackness and Atlantic Modernism, 1907–61
30 June - 2 July 2011

Symposium: University of Liverpool, UK

About the Symposium

Confirmed Keynotes: Professor Tyler Stovall, University of California, Berkeley

Afromodernisms 2 focuses on the relationship between the Afro-Atlantic and the modernist canon. Specifically, the symposium seeks to address the ways in which current configurations of modernism—the art and literature of the new—may be inflected, expanded, or even called into question by either localized or transnational Africanist interventions into the politics and culture of the first half of the twentieth century.

Call for Papers

What constitutes a ‘modernist’ response to the experience of the modern? What categories underpin the aesthetic category ‘modernism’? How might emphasis on black diapora subject positions, representations, and artistic and political interventions, inflect current canonical configurations of modernism? To what extent might black feminist positions revise or even reject the totalizing tendencies of the male voice in canonical works of black modernism, for example, Négritude?

Themes and Topics

The aims of the conference are the following:
  • to debate the tenets of modernism (its newness, breaks with tradition, interest in the exotic and the primitive, its sense of fragmentation and displacement, and the way it conceives of the individual subject) in two contexts: first in terms of the work produced by African diaspora artists and writers; second, in relation to the symbolic presence of representations of blackness in the work of Anglo-American, Caribbean and European modernists.
  • to consider the degree to which a variety of actors operating from what might be termed ‘alternative’ or ‘displaced’ metropoles interacted to produce, in Jameson’s terms, an ‘active sense’ of the history of modernity, one in which a black presence was of key aesthetic, political and cultural importance.
  • to expand Perry Anderson’s claim, directed primarily at European modernist movements, that one of the indispensible co-ordinates for locating modernism is its ‘proximity to social revolution,’ to include a range of Afro-Atlantic revolutionary positions. We therefore welcome papers that consider the range of anti-colonial and/or feminist responses to the experience of modernity operating across the Atlantic in the inter- and post-war years.
  • to reconsider the emergence of literary and artistic avant-gardes in the context of black anti-colonial, feminist, and (pan)nationalist movements, the two world wars, and, in the interwar period, against the backdrop of fascism and communism.
Individual papers and proposals for panels, in English, are invited, addressing, but not limited to the following circumatlantic themes:
  • Gender
  • Black performance/performance of blackness
  • blackness and/in visual art
  • modernism and primitivism
  • modernist landscapes and/or the city
  • science, technology and the machine
  • narrative, subjectivity, psychoanalysis
  • the politics of history
  • blackness and genre
  • island modernisms (e.g. Antillean, Irish, Cape Verdian)
  • tradition and experimentation
  • modernism, politics and the metropole (Paris, London, Mexico, Dublin, Marseille, Berlin, Hamburg, Moscow, DC, New York)
  • modernist soundscapes
  • black writers/artists in/and Europe
  • modernism and ideology
  • modernism and the canon, including the Harlem Renaissance, Négritude, and Paris Noir
  • formal innovation/ the language of modernism
  • informal networks
  • the work of ‘high’ and not-so-high modernists, for example, Eliot,
  • Faulkner, McKay, Beckett, Pound, Stevens, Williams, Hughes,  Joyce, Hurston
  • responses to revolution: Easter 1916, November 1918, Spain 1936

Submissions

For individual papers, please send a working title, abstract of 250–350 words, and a biographical note to: Fionnghuala Sweeney: fsweeney@liv.ac.uk or Kate Marsh: clmarsh@liv.ac.uk

Proposal for panels should contain a panel title, working titles for individual papers, with individual abstracts of 250 words each, and brief biographical notes on the chair and/or speakers to: Fionnghuala Sweeney: fsweeney@liv.ac.uk or Kate Marsh: clmarsh@liv.ac.uk.

Proposals on teaching and curating are also welcomed, as are offers to act as chair or respondent.

Deadline for Submissions: 11 April, 2011.
4.11.10

Benoît Peeters, Derrida

A new biography explores the life of the renowned French philosopher
Jacques Derrida. Photograph: Richard Melloul/Sygma/Corbis
Elisabeth Roudinesco takes a look at Benoît Peeters' Derrida, a new biography of the French philosopher:
In addressing a philosopher of the importance of Jacques Derrida, whose massive output – about 60 volumes not including his as yet unpublished seminars – has been translated and debated the world over, Benoît Peeters has quite rightly chosen not the origins or content of the work itself, but the life of the man behind it. In short, he has written an excellent biography entirely in keeping with Anglo-Saxon traditions. He is the first to have gained access to the writer's records at France's Institute of Contemporary Publishing Archives and the Langson Library at the University of California, Irvine. He also interviewed around 100 essential figures.

He has reconstructed the events that prompted a young, non-practising Jew, born in 1930 in Algeria and banned from his lycée in 1942 by the Vichy government, to move to Paris in 1949 to study at the Lycée Louis le Grand, subsequently graduating to the Ecole Normale Supérieure.

In 1966, after acquainting himself with the work of the phenomenologist Edmund Husserl, Derrida took part in the celebrated symposium on structuralism organised by Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore that brought together Roland Barthes, Jean-Pierre Vernant, Jean Hyppolite, René Girard and Jacques Lacan, among others. A year later he met Paul de Man, a theorist of modernist literary criticism, who introduced him to several US universities. He was soon rewarded with considerable success, particularly after the publication of De la Grammatologie (Of Grammatology) and L'Ecriture et la Différence (Writing and Difference). Over the next 10 years he found his place between two generations of brilliant thinkers, engaging in constant dialogue with Emmanuel Lévinas, Maurice Blanchot, Jean Genet, Michel Foucault, Pierre Bourdieu and Louis Althusser.

Meanwhile, he worked hard on research, teaching and publication. In 1983, with several fellows, he founded the International College of Philosophy, then took up a post at the Graduate School of Social Sciences. His fame spread and his virulent critique of Marxism, structuralism and a certain ideal of overturning the established order – mistakenly seen as "1968" thinking – percolated down through French public opinion. From 1986 he increasingly came under attack. The tide of hatred grew so strong as to dash any hopes of election to the Collège de France.

In fact, Derrida remained a social democrat opposed to colonialism and capital punishment, a feminist, a true Enlightenment scholar, attached to republican values, and an admirer of De Gaulle and Mandela. But from around 1987, as Peeters points out, he was successively depicted as an anti-democratic nihilist and an adept of two Nazi theorists – Carl Schmitt and Martin Heidegger – whose work he had investigated, then as an extreme leftwinger, on account of Spectres de Marx (Spectres of Marx), a major work on the concept of revolution. Finally he was accused of being a Nazi, after making a clumsy attempt to defend his friend De Man, whose murky past working on an antisemitic Belgian newspaper had emerged after his death.

Peeters sheds light on all this nonsense while revealing the many facets of a passionate thinker who travelled widely and invented a new language of philosophy. This explains his interest in a wide range of subjects (literature, law), social situations (exclusion, homosexuality) and struggles against suffering and discrimination (racism, antisemitism). [Read more]

Also at A Piece of Monologue:
19.9.10

Disjecta: This week's links

Your guide to this week's best cultural links
Maurice Blanchot, Political Writings 1953-1993

Literature:

Jane Austen: Fiction manuscripts now available online
Lee Rourke and Tom McCarthy: Discussion of Blanchot, Derrida, Beckett, and others
Literature & Philosophy Desktop Wallpapers
Library Counter made from recycled library books
David Foster Wallace: Manuscript archive at the Harry Ransom Center in Texas is now open for research
Has present-tense narration taken over fiction?
William S. Burroughs: Graphic novel, Ah Pook is Here, to be published for the first time
Gabriel Josipovici: Mark Thwaite on What Ever Happened to Modernism?
Cliché: Daniel Hartley on Marcel Proust and Jacques Derrida

Philosophy & Critical Theory:

Simon Critchley: Review of a new collection of interviews, How to Stop Living and Start Worrying
Jacques Derrida: French philosopher interviews jazz musician Ornette Coleman about
Maurice Blanchot: Gray Kochhar-Lindgren on Blanchot and the irreal
Maurice Blanchot: Political Writings 1953-1993
BBC on Philosophy Bites
Feminism: Assuming Gender on issues in Western feminist theory from the 1970s to the present
Roland Barthes' Mourning Diary

Film & Television:

Claude Chabrol 1930-2010: BFI obituary
Drew Struzan: Film poster artwork
Alfred Hitchcock: Walthamstow to get new Hitchcock statue
Werner Herzog: Herzog discusses his new 3D film, Cave of Forgotten Dreams, on Roger Ebert's Journal

Theatre:

Thomas Bernhard: Jonathan Taylor reviews the impact of the current production of Bernhard's Ritter, Dene, Voss
Samuel Beckett: Conor Lovett to perform Beckett's First Love in Australia
Franz Kafka: Composer Philip Glass discusses his operatic adaptation of Kafka's In the Penal Colony

Art, Design & Photography:

Dante Alighieri: Salvador Dalí's illustrations for the Divine Comedy
Dante Alighieri: Russian illustrations of La Vita Nuova

Etc.:

Stewart Lee: Phil Daoust reviews new book, How I Escaped My Certain Fate
Moleskine Notebooks: Do you love them or hate them?

Thank you to all link contributors, who can be found on the A Piece of Monologue Twitter page.
3.4.10

Philip Roth: In his own words

A selection of quotes from the American novelist
Philip Roth

As part of a Sunday Times guide to the work of Philip Roth, Steve Amidon collects a the writer's thoughts on a variety of topics:
On the reception of Portnoy’s Complaint: So many claimed to be offended by the masturbation. But that’s silly. Everybody knew about masturbation. What they were really offended by was the depiction of this level of brutality in a Jewish family.

On being Jewish-American: I know exactly what it means to be Jewish, and it’s really not interesting. I’m an American... America is first and foremost ... it’s my language. Identity labels have nothing to do with how anyone actually experiences life... I don’t accept that I write Jewish-American fiction. I don’t buy that nonsense about black literature or feminist literature. Those are labels made up to strengthen some political agenda.

On how he compares: Updike and Bellow hold their flashlights out into the world, reveal the world as it is now. I dig a hole and shine my flashlight into the hole.

On his literary alter egos: Am I Roth or Zuckerman? It’s all me ... Nothing is me.

On his range: Sheer Playfulness and Deadly Seriousness are my closest friends.

On work: The road to hell is paved with works-in-progress.

On ageing: Passion doesn’t change, but you change – you become older. The thirst for women becomes more poignant. And there is a power in the pathos of sex it didn’t have before.

On fearing death: Oblivion. Of not being alive, quite simply, of not feeling life, not smelling it. But the difference between today and when I was 12 is a kind of resignation. It no longer feels like a great injustice that I have to die. [Read the article]

Also at A Piece of Monologue
10.2.10

Will Self on Ballard and Academia

British writer recalls the influence of J. G. Ballard, and admonishes the academic establishment
Will Self at the J. G. Ballard Memorial. Photograph by Rick McGrath.

The Literateur Magazine has published a lengthy interview with British novelist Will Self, who candidly talks about his work, academia, J. G. Ballard and the limitations of writing:
Well, instead of asking about what you think is happening, where do you think you can go as a writer bearing in mind there is no taboo? A lot of fiction centres on the tension between what can be said and what can’t, and new ways of saying things. If there’s no limitation on what you can say, where does fiction go from there?

Will Self: I was terribly interested – well, I wasn’t that interested because it was terribly boring, but you know – when Hillary Mantel won the Booker this year. I like Hillary; she’s a nice woman, not that I know her that well, but I’ve met her a few times. She came out with this old crappy canard, some journo asked her ‘Why do you write these historical novels?’ and she said, ‘Because I’m not a journalist’. They said ‘Is there not anything to write about now?’. And she said, ‘I think you have to let events settle down: I’m not writing journalism here’. But while it’s true that there is a type of fiction which is reportage masquerading as something invented… there is fiction to be written about now and it’s important that it’s written now. If it’s not written now, it’s like when you see a film of The Great Gatsby that was made in the seventies: it looks like the seventies. That’s always going to be the case; there’s always going to be that built-in obsolescent decadence about it. It’s important that writers who can write write about now. Maybe the death of the avant garde is just a punch you’ve got to roll with. Whichever way it falls, you’ve got to accept that. I mean, the book I’m working on at the moment is about film, which I think has died as the dominant narrative medium now. And while it’s something that’s recognised, this new shoot ‘em up video game which came out last week which is the highest grossing entertainment, so it’s kind of recognised as such. So for example, the novel was always pitted against film. Why is that? The novel is its own form, but you have John Dos Passos, writing in the USA back in the 1940s, trying to write a novel like a movie, or even something like Burrough’s Naked Lunch which is like a series of film routines. So the novel in some way measured itself as a narrative form that can grasp the zeitgeist in contradistinction to the film. Now, arguably, the relationship between the novel and the film has been like the relationship between the West and Soviet Communism. It needed it. The novel kind of needed film to say what it was not. We’re not like those fucking Soviets with their awful Gulag, we’re not like movies. So how is the novel going to respond to the pre-eminence of video games (which is, after all, totally unlike either the novel or film, in that the audience grabs control of the role of the writer to a limited extent, operates as a sort of pseudo-creator within the defined parameters of the new environment)? How’s that going to affect the novel? I don’t know, but those are some of the things I’ve been interested in, trying to respond to that and to write something about that relationship between the novel and film and the coming, emergent narrative technology. I think that’s interesting. [...]
On academia:
Moving on, I read that you one said ‘a lifetime of idleness in academia would have really suited me’ which strikes me as rather amusingly backhanded compliment. What value do you think there is (if any) in the academic approach to literature?

Will Self: For whom?

For contemporary and working writers, rather than the classics?

Will Self: Well, I realised by the time I was about seventeen that studying literature was a bad way to go for a creative writer. You study it in the sense that you read and you understand the mechanics of how books work and that is the only education for a writer. But studying it formally and academically, and certainly theoretically, is I think the kiss of death because it starts becoming artifactual rather than art at that level. I did an English S level – this is back in the seventies obviously – and [Jacques Derrida's concept of] deconstruction was just coming in and I started getting acquainted with things like that when I was in my teens, and thought ‘woo, no’ for all sorts of reasons. Partly because critical theory is just a sort of refuge for philosophy rather than being anything in its own right, and particularly with deconstruction. But also because it’s deadly for your perception of literature I think, if you’re a creative writer. Every field now has its spurious professionalism, and in the last ten years we’ve got double the number of university students in this country than there were previously, and double the amount of graduate unemployment [laughs]. But there’s always been this sort of attitude. I remember when I first started publishing, and it occasionally resurfaces, there’s this idea that you can’t be a proper writer if you haven’t got a degree in English Literature. Its like you’re a plumber or something and you haven’t got your Corgi Gas Installation Qualification [laughs].

I find it kind of laughable actually myself. It’s faintly ludicrous. But as regards Lit Crit approaches to my own work, I don’t really have an opinion. The beauty for me of being a writer is that you put it out there and how people choose to approach it is absolutely their own affair. I’m stunned by the number of young people who…well, not that many, but the few and increasing numbers who approach me when they have a thesis to do on my work and say ‘Will I help them with their thesis?’ I always write back and say, ‘Look, you’re the critic. There’s the work. Your job is to actually respond to it, not get me to help you respond to it.’
On J. G. Ballard:
Throughout your work you’re very open about your influences and the traditions you’re writing in. Are you aware of writing in a tradition, or making a contribution to one, or is it where you’d be writing naturally if you didn’t read and enjoy other books?

Will Self: I don’t know, am I any more up-front about it that anybody else?

I’d say, for example, in the essay at the front of Psycho Too you’re writing directly in homage to J. G. Ballard, and we’ve already discussed the Ballardian feel of Dubai. I’m sure other writers talk about their influences in interviews, but not everybody might foreground it so boldly in their work.

Will Self: He is the only one though. There isn’t anybody else. When I got rid of Burroughs about ten years ago, I wrote a long essay on him that sort of pushed him away. I summed up and apotheosised the extent to which I was influenced by him and moved beyond it and by extension the whole beat thing, and by extension really around that time I accepted the death of the avant garde. For writers like me, if there are writers like me…yeah, writers like me. It’s this label of ‘cult fiction’ or you know, it’s what the avant garde used to be isn’t it? I think anybody smart realises there can’t be anything like the avant garde any more because there isn’t any taboo to be broken. So how can you have an avant garde? You can write anything you want. The avant garde of necessity represented the people who were prepared to write down the things that people commonly thought but were unable to express because of all sorts of taboos. It no longer exists any more and hasn’t since, it’s hard to say, probably since 1980. It’s an arbitrary point, OK? So then it becomes cult fiction which is like the identity politics of literature, it’s like having sections of a bookshop like ‘troubled lives’, ‘feminism’. So I think I kind of moved away from that association. I suppose I did feel as I set out to write, actually, even in the late 80s, that while there was a discourse within which you could say the things I wanted to say it wasn’t coextensive with what people thought of literary fiction still. And that still seems to be the case. I think a lot of literary fiction, what is perceived as being the significant contemporary literary fiction still seems incredibly recondite. Well, not recondite. Incredibly reactionary to me. It’s like Modernism never happened a lot of the time, isn’t it? They’ll write three-decker kind of Victorian novels, A. S. Byatt or Ian McEwan. They seem very recherché to me and also what’s permissible within them still seems very toned down. That being said, there’s still no avant garde. It’s not about taboos. So do I feel influenced. Well, I feel influenced by everything I’ve ever read. Which is a lot, as you’d imagine. It’s interesting. It’s nice being middle aged. It’s quite exciting, because you get to re-read stuff that was very formative in your late teens early twenties. Increasingly, I write introductions and things like that. I look at texts again, and that’s interesting because then you see what the ambit of that influence is. Do I feel I’m contributing to anything? I just don’t know, I don’t know. I get very pessimistic about this because of this salad bar. I think when the avant-garde existed you could feel you’d done a good job just by writing the word fuck. You know, there seems to be so much literature, to me. Doesn’t there seem an awful lot published to you? [Read the article]

More at A Piece of Monologue:
10.1.10

Disjecta: This week's links



(Image: Paul Buckley's design for the 25th Anniversary edition of Don DeLillo's White Noise)

A number of interesting articles and reviews in this week's selection. Jonathan Jones speculates on the degeneration of Philip Roth's artistic powers, Will Self meets The Road director John Hillcoat, and Joyce Carol Oates takes time out of her busy schedule to answer questions. There's also a link to Žižek's recent appearance on The Today Programme, a review of Celan's correspondence, and fifteen things you may or may not already know about coffee.

Literature:

Philip Roth: Jonathan Jones on The Humbling and Roth's late career
Don DeLillo: Celebrating the 25th anniversary of White Noise
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn: Writer's son his father's rejects 'Old Testament' image
Paul Celan: Benjamin Ivry on Celan's Letters
J. M. Coetzee: The New Yorker briefly reviews Coetzee's Summertime
Philip K. Dick: Controversy grows over Google's Android/Nexus product line
Joyce Carol Oates: Questions and Answers

Philosophy & Critical Theory:

Slavoj Žižek: Žižek appears on BBC Radio 4's The Today Programme
Feminism: The Guardian reviews 'the feminist year ahead'

Music:

Jazz: Miles Davis' b-flat trumpet, on display in LA's Grammy Museum
Stewart Lee: Lee chooses his top musical influences
Samuel Beckett: Morton Feldman's Neither, words by Samuel Beckett

Film:

DVDs of 2009: Sight and Sound Magazine's top picks
Disney: Racial and gender stereotypes in Disney animations
Will Self: Self meets John Hillcoat, director of The Road

Television:

The Wire: A profile of the career of Michael K. Williams, The Wire's Omar Little
Mad Men: Life lessons from a Mad Men art assistant

Art:

The art of Henri Privat-Livemont

Etc.:

The Onion: Front pages 1988-2008
Cardiff Arcades Project
Coffee: Fifteen Things Worth Knowing About Coffee
24.10.09

Open Yale Courses: Theories of Literature

A selection of free online podcasts

Mike Johnduff at Working Notes has drawn attention to a series of free lectures offered at the Open Yale Courses website. The lectures, presented by Professor Paul H. Fry, comprise an Introduction to Theory of Literature, and include class sessions on some of the key concerns of contemporary critical theory. For instance, among the titles available for download are: Freud and Fiction, Jacques Lacan in Theory, The Postmodern Psyche and Derridean Deconstruction I and II.

The series promises a solid foundation to some of the central concepts in literary theory, from structuralism, historicism, formalism and psychoanalysis to recent theoretical developments in feminism, Queer theory, postcolonialism and postmodernity:
This is a survey of the main trends in twentieth-century literary theory. Lectures will provide background for the readings and explicate them where appropriate, while attempting to develop a coherent overall context that incorporates philosophical and social perspectives on the recurrent questions: what is literature, how is it produced, how can it be understood, and what is its purpose?

All audio downloads are free, and vary in length from forty to fifty minutes.

Links