16.1.13

Advertising and Consumer Culture: Postgraduate Symposium

University of York · 31 May 2013


Advertising and Consumer Culture
Third Annual Postgraduate Symposium
University of York
Centre for Modern Studies
Bowland Auditorium
Humanities Research Centre
Friday 31 May 2013

About the Symposium

Commercial speech – advertising – makes up most of what we share as a culture . . . As the language of commercialism has become louder, the language of high culture has become quieter.

– James B. Twitchell, Twenty Ads that Shook the World
Throughout the modern period, advertising and consumer culture have dominated everyday life; moreover, the trappings of commercialism permeate much of supposed ‘high culture’. Commodities clutter the pages of novels from Dickens and Zola to Bret Easton Ellis; works by Joyce and DeLillo are enlivened by advertising jingles and slogans; brands and trademarks pervade the practice of artists from Picasso to Warhol and the visualisation of consumer desire is appropriated and challenged in the work of Richard Hamilton and Martha Rosler.

Whether celebrating or critiquing advertising and consumer culture, art reflects our enduring fascination with them, despite research into the psychological effects of advertising, concerns over the evils of consumerism, and the often sinister nature of market research. The recent television show Mad Men, for instance, has revivified interest and scholarly debate surrounding the power of advertising and the consumer, as well as restaging debates around sexism, truth and the heteronormative ideal. Meanwhile, sociology in the wake of Erving Goffman continues to explore advertising’s uses and abuses of gender, identity and desire. Countervailing against consumerism and advertising’s many critics, theorists such as Michel de Certeau and the critical movement Thing Theory have endeavoured to examine advertising and consumer culture from a standpoint that goes beyond the model of the ‘passive consumer’ or Marx’s account of commodity fetishism.

We invite abstracts for 20 minute papers from postgraduate students and early-career researchers working in the modern period (1850-present day) across the humanities and social sciences. This conference aims to provoke interdisciplinary discussion about advertising and consumer culture. We therefore welcome papers that address these topics from historical, sociological, political or anthropological perspectives, as well as papers that analyse advertisements themselves and the representation of advertising and modern consumer culture in literature, film, television, theatre, and visual art.

Topics for Discussion

Topics for discussion may include but are by no means limited to:
  • The ways in which advertising and consumer culture intersect with issues of class, gender, sexuality and ethnicity
  • Psychological/psychoanalytic perspectives on advertising and consumer behaviour; how identity is created and reflected through participation in consumer culture; the legacy of Freud and Bernays
  • How artists have appropriated the techniques of advertising, or have been co-opted by advertising and commodity culture (Koons, Rosler, Murakami, Kusama and Hirst) -Theorists who have engaged with advertising and consumer culture (Adorno, Barthes, Baudrillard, Certeau, Fukuyama, Goffman, Klein, Marx, McLuhan)
  • The use of music in advertisements
  • The formal innovations literature has adopted to create a poetics of advertising/consumer culture
  • Shopping, the rise of the department store, brand names, and their representation in culture
  • Histories of advertising agencies or ‘ad-men’
  • How the importance of advertising in art may challenge the boundaries between high and low culture and/or modernism and postmodernism
  • Anti-consumerist movements (the Situationist International, Adbusters) and strategies (détournement, culture jamming)
  • The recent transformations advertising has undergone as a result of social media -The advert as spectacle or ‘event’ (celebrity endorsements, Christmas advertising, product placement, Pawel Althamer’s Real Time Movie)
  • Figures who have worked in advertising, either before or during their artistic careers (Fitzgerald, Rushdie, DeLillo, Warhol, Lynch)
  • Political advertising and the roles of politics in advertising

Submissions

Abstracts for papers should be no more than 300 words in length, and submitted by Monday 25th March 2013 to cmods-pgforum@york.ac.uk. We ask that applicants also include a short biography. For further information about the symposium or the CModS Postgraduate Forum, please contact us at this address, or visit http://www.york.ac.uk/modernstudies/postgraduate-forum/

Also at A Piece of Monologue:
22.10.12

Dancing Around Duchamp

A new exhibition at London's Barbican
© Marcel Duchamp, Fountain, 1950 (replica of 1917 original)
Charlotte Higgins (The Guardian) (link via 3:AM Magazine): 'Some worship his genius; others believe that because of him the history of art swerved badly off course. One thing is for sure: the legacy of Marcel Duchamp – the man who put urinals and bicycle wheels into galleries and called them art – has been the most dominant single influence over the art of the late 20th and early 21st century, far outstripping even that modern master, Picasso.' [Read More]

Also at A Piece of Monologue:
18.7.12

Mark Lawson: why don't more visual artists do theatre?

Why aren't collaborations between visual and performance art more common?
Alberto Giacometti (left) with a sculpted tree for Samuel Beckett's (right) Waiting for Godot
From The Guardian: 'Stage design is clearly a form of art, but full-time painters and sculptors have only rarely become involved in theatre – although two current exhibitions demonstrate the potential when they do. The thrilling Edvard Munch exhibition at Tate Modern in London includes a room devoted to the Norwegian artist's work in theatre, and the sculptor Antony Gormley has on show at Castle Coole in Enniskillen a work called Godot Tree – Gormley's interpretation of the opening stage direction ("A country road. A tree. Evening.") in Samuel Beckett's Waiting for Godot. The tree, which is required to grow four or five leaves during the interval, will be used in a world-touring production that begins in Australia later this year.' [Read More]

Also at A Piece of Monologue:
16.9.10

Literature & Philosophy Desktop Wallpapers

Philosophical and literary quotes for your desktop
What follows is a small selection of the desktop wallpapers available at Sentense.me, a website devoted to quotations from writers, philosophers, musicians, artists and celebrities:














 
11.7.10

Disjecta: This week's links

Colin Forth in Tom Ford's adaptation of Christopher Isherwood's 'A Single Man'

Colin Firth in Tom Ford's adaptation of A Single Man

Literature:

QuercusBooks: Publisher is now on Twitter
William S. Burroughs: Brion Gysin, William Burroughs, and the secret life of a building on the Bowery.
Philip K. Dick, Interview in France, 1977: Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3
Christopher Isherwood: An excerpt from A Single Man
Most Reclusive Authors of the 20th Century
Real People Behind Famous Fictional Characters
Joyce Carol Oates: New collection of essays and reviews, In Rough Country
Bram Stoker Commemorative Plaque removed 'illegally'
Samuel Beckett on Marcel Proust

Philosophy:

Slavoj Žižek: Interview with the Daily Telegraph with opinions on 'every subject, from decaffeinated coffee to sex, from seagulls and swearing to the end of the world'.
Maurice Blanchot: A conversation about the proofs of Maurice Blanchot’s L’Entretien infini at Houghton Library
Carl Jung on Death

Music

Lou Reed: Improvisation at jazz festival prompts anger from the audience

Film & Television:

Alfred Hitchcock: BFI launches search for missing Alfred Hitchcock film
Alfred Hitchcock: BFI Project 'Save the Hitchcock 9' aims to preserve the director's early silent films

Art:

Finding Edward Hopper's Nighthawks
The Political World of Pablo Picasso

Thank you to all link contributors, who can be found on the A Piece of Monologue Twitter page.
2.4.08

Moleskine Notebooks

Do you love them or hate them?
Moleskine Notebook
I think I'll always love writing in Moleskine notebooks. They come in all kinds of shapes and sizes, but have a wonderfully simple, classic design. I use one almost everyday, and even make gifts of them to loved ones. But there is something unwholesome about the image of the Moleskine notebook that's deep-rooted and unsettling. And it bothers me.

The Moleskine advertising campaign is a perfect example of aspirational consumerism. Its far-reaching romantic mythology is little more than a marketing ploy, intended to pamper a narcissistic sense of our innermost creative selves. I mean, really: who among us doesn't secretly consider themselves a creative and free-thinking individual? Moleskine is a cunning little exploitation of this rather pleasant feeling: and it prompts our sense of selves more fully, but at a price.

To inscribe your name onto the front page of a Moleskine is not so much a practicality as a pledge: in the case of it being lost, we are forced to ask ourselves how much we would be willing to pay to ensure its safe return. And so, even though the item is still in our possession, we are already selling our Moleskines back to ourselves - no doubt under the vain pretext of essential personal insights it might one day contain.

It's very easy to judge a notebook by its cover; to value the brand of a product rather than its content; but it's worth remembering that if you want to write down your thoughts you don't need to pay a fortune for the privilege. Picking up a Moleskine does not make you a Picasso, any more than drinking a Martini makes you James Bond. The idea that artistry passes somehow exclusively through a specific brand-name is laughable. Think about it: Picasso, Chatwin, Hemingway. What links these men together? Okay, aside from their convenient iconic status as artistic cornerstones? Not much.

These men aren't even linked by the Moleskine: a notebook that was not mass-produced or branded while any of them were alive.

I'm surprised by how far Moleskine have gone to secure some kind of stable link with the artistic, creative community. For a start there's 'Detour': "a Moleskine project dedicated to traveling culture and creativity worldwide. An itinerant group show that features Moleskine notebooks created by internationally recognized artists, architects, film directors, graphic designers, illustrators, and writers..." Yes, yes, we get the picture. But where do we fit, exactly? After all, when we walk into our nearest stationary store the Moleskine notebooks are all blank aren't they? Isn't it us who should be doing the writing?

The UK Moleskine website has even stooped to modifying literary quotations, in a rather embarrassing attempt to secure greater respect for the brand. Example? I call Oscar Wilde to the stand: 'I never travel without my notebook. One should always have something sensational to read in the train.' The well-read among you will be aware that the word notebook is incorrect here. Wilde, of course, never travels without his 'diary'. (I hope Moleskine are taking notes.) But the difference is negligible, isn't it? Perhaps we could go a little further and say Wilde never travels without his Moleskine? So much for the respect of the artists.

Call me cynical, but there's something about the Moleskine notebook that gets under my skin. They're over-priced vehicles of pretension. In fact, if they didn't look and feel so lovely I'd probably stop using mine altogether.